Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
J. Fearnley
To Win
J. Ingildsen
To Win
Jacob Fearnley vs Johannes Ingildsen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - 07-11-23
By Wojtek Kolan - July 11, 2023
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fearnley vs Ingildsen analysis and find out who is favored!
Upcoming Match
Fearnley VS Ingildsen PREDICTION Grass
M25 Nottingham atp
11 Jul 2023 / First
ODDS
Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Jacob Fearnley takes on Johannes Ingildsen in the ATP M25 Nottingham Men's Singles 2023 on July 11, 2023. Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page.
Jacob Fearnley vs Johannes Ingildsen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fearnley 0 - 0 Ingildsen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fearnley has won 50.47% of points on his second serve, while Ingildsen has won 40.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fearnley, in recent form, has won 62.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ingildsen has won 45.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.35% and 38.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fearnley has saved 71.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ingildsen has saved 53.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fearnley has won 85.71% of matches played (W/L 24/ 4), with Ingildsen winning 50% (W/L 19/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 86% (W/L 25/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ingildsen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 19/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fearnley has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 24/ 4), where as Ingildsen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fearnley has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.07 while Ingildsen has played against players with an average rank of 114.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fearnley has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ingildsen has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fearnley has converted 47.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ingildsen has converted 43.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fearnley 0 - 0 Ingildsen
508
Rank
506
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
638
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
78% (35-10)
Career Total W/L
57% (98-75)
100% (8-0)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats 
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
|||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacob Fearnley | Johannes Ingildsen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (22/32) | 43% (26/35) |
| Aces pg | 0.73 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 693 | 92.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (82/147) | 60% (41/68) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (60/82) | 56% (23/41) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (29/65) | 41% (11/27) |
| BPs Won% Total | 29% (4/14) | 17% (2/12) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (61/180) | 35% (26/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Federico Iannaccone
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Yanki Erel
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Kylian Collignon
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tim Handel
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Alexey Vatutin
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
13
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijmen Loof
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
8
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Johannes Ingildsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johannes Ingildsen
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
79
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
74%
(
93 of
126)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
113)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
57 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Johannes Ingildsen
Player
Max Cunat
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fearnley Vs Ingildsen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
